Kevin Tremblay, V.P., National Accounts for SMS National Solutions in Altamonte Springs, Florida, and a connection of mine on LinkedIn, penned the following article about California work comp and liens.
Normally, I shy away from articles involving California work comp, but on one or two occasions have written articles about it that I feel fit the subject of this blog. This article is one of those, but is more about the mismanagement of one state’s work comp system, rather than the state of affairs of the entire system nationwide.
Here is Kevin’s article in full:
California Workers Compensation System – Liens, Waste and Medical Provider Billed Charges
The California workers’ compensation system is unique like no other state in the country. There are two distinct sides of the equation in California workers’ compensation, Applicant and Defense.
Applicant-The party, usually the claimant that opens a case at the local Workers Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) office by filing an application for adjudication of claim.
Defense-The party, usually the employer or its insurance company opposing the claimant in a dispute over services and benefits.
Lien-A right or claim for payment against a workers’ compensation case. A lien claimant, such as a medical provider, can file a form with the local Workers Compensation Appeals Board to request payments of money owed in a workers’ compensation case.
OMFS-The official medical fee schedule is promulgated by the DWC, Department of workers Compensation administrative director under labor code section 5307.1 and can be found in section 9789.10 of title 8, California code of regulations. It is used for payment of medical services required to treat work related injuries and illnesses. The California Official Medical Fee Schedule is considered prima facie evidence of reasonableness.
A lien claimant has the burden of proving that any amount charged is reasonable, and a lien claimant must prove that there are “extraordinary circumstances” that justify a fee that exceeds the Official Medical Fee Schedule.
According to some recent reports, an expected 500,000 liens will be filed by treating medical providers in the California Workers Compensation system in 2015, costing employers and insurers an estimated $200 million dollars in loss adjustment expenses and delaying claims adjudication.
Some of these liens forces some employers or insurance companies to settle liens they may not be legally obligated to pay simply to settle and close the claim to avoid paying additional disability, administrative and legal costs. Emphasis here on, ‘forces’
Some additional statistical findings reported by the DWC are:
- Medical treatment liens account for more than 60 percent of the liens filed, and 80 percent of the dollars in dispute.
- $1.5 billion per year is claimed in medical lien disputes after adjusting for amended lien files.
- One-third of medical liens involve disputes over the application of the Official Medical Fee Schedule.
- Authorization for treatment was in dispute in seven out of 10 medical liens surveyed.
- Reasons treatment was not authorized were: 37 percent provider not authorized to treat (mostly out-of-network); 7 percent denied claims; 6 percent medical necessity of treatment rejected by utilization review; 1 percent contested body parts; 20 percent authorization status unknown or not stated.
- The volume of liens filings is sensitive to procedural changes, such as the adoption or repeal of a $100 filing fee and the adoption of new filing procedures.
- Up to 30 percent of medical liens are prematurely submitted before the time has elapsed for the claims administrator to pay or object to the provider’s bill.
- Ten percent of medical liens are submitted on the date the service is provided.
- Nearly one quarter of medical liens are filed more than two years after the last date of services for which payment is claimed, including 6 percent that are filed five or more years after the last date of services.
The report was based on information provided by the Division of Workers’ Compensation, and was an attempt to characterize the problem so policymakers can propose solutions to the lien problem.
The Lien System Game:
Bill ($5,000) – Paid ($1,000)-in accordance with OMFS
Fee to file the lien the claim in court by medical provider $150.00
Lien balance $4000
Collector says $3200 is the bottom line for him
Adjuster forced to pay and settle to avoid additional claim cost agreement at $3200
So while the DWC and legislators continue to sort over of resolve the issues of the lien process, what can adjuster’s implement to mitigate the process and reduce claims costs? The following strategies are a good place to start:
- How much is the lien?
- How much is the OMFS or reasonable value of the lien?
- What are your lien defenses?
- OMFS or other fee schedules / IBR
- Reasonableness & Necessity
- UR / IMR
- Other technical issues
- What evidence do you have to support your position? Objection letters? MPN Notices?
- Did you serve your evidence on the lien claimants and/or your counsel?
- What are the probable economics of your decision to settle or fight?
- How much are you willing to pay to settle or resolve the lien?
- We paid per OMFS & DOS is after 1/1/13
- You failed to request 2nd review within 90 days (LC 4603.2(e)(2))
- You failed to request IBR within 30 days from 2nd review (LC 4603.6(a)
- You are done. The Code says: “the bill shall be deemed satisfied and neither the employer nor the employee shall be liable for any further payments.”
- Any appearance at the board on your lien will result in a petition for costs & sanctions! [LC 5811 & Valdez decision (en banc) (77 CCC 1113)]
The State of California has taken recent measures with the advent of SB863 and labor codes 9792.5.12 and 4903.1(b) regarding independent bill review process and tighter lien submission rules. California legislators need to continue to act and close the loop holes in existing laws to mitigate and eventually eliminate the magnitude of waste and abuse by certain medical providers that is currently taking place and plaguing the workers’ compensation system.
The lien process is certainly unique to the rest of the country’s state by state workers’ compensation system. So what is it? Unethical gaming of the system and adding tremendous unnecessary costs and clogging the California courts and workers’ compensation system, no question. Anything more, you decide…..