Category Archives: Ecuador

Baby Formula Battle Redux


In the mid-1970’s, a boycott was launched to protest the promotion of baby formula in the Third World by the Nestlé Company of Switzerland. I remember it well, because I researched it while in college.

At the crux of the boycott was that due to poor water quality, and the high cost of the infant formula which was in powder form and had to be mixed with the water, babies were not getting sufficient nutrition from the formula because of contaminated water and because their mothers only used less than the recommended amount of formula to make it last longer.

The worldwide boycott was promoted by a documentary that explained how Nestlé promoted the formula in countries mainly in Africa, and how the contaminated water supply, plus the watered down formula led to various diseases in infants.

The boycott has, according to Wikipedia, been cancelled and renewed because of business practices of Nestlé and other manufacturers.

The New York Times reported yesterday, that earlier this spring, in Geneva, a resolution regarding breast-feeding was expected to pass quickly and easily, was opposed by the American delegation to the World Health Assembly, a UN-affiliated organization.

According to the Times, American officials sought to water down the resolution by removing language that called on governments to “protect, promote and support breast-feeding” and another passage that called on policymakers to restrict the promotion of food products that many experts say can have deleterious effects on young children.

The American effort failed, so in keeping with the current regime’s bullying tactics against friends and allies and trading partners, the Times reported that they turned to threats, according to diplomats and government officials who took part in the discussions.

One of the countries they threatened was Ecuador. Ecuador had planned to introduce the measure. The fascist regime told the Ecuadoreans that if they refused to drop the resolution, Washington would unleash punishing trade measures and withdraw crucial military aid. The Ecuadorean government quickly acquiesced.

Research has proven that mother’s milk is healthiest for children and countries should strive to limit the inaccurate or misleading marketing of breast milk substitutes, the Times went on to say. A 2016 Lancet study found that universal breast-feeding would prevent 800,000 deaths a year around the world, and yield $300 billion in savings from reduced health care costs, and improved economic outcomes for those reared on breast milk.

But owing to its slavish devotion to corporate America and the pursuit of profit at any cost, the fascist regime in Washington has embraced the interests of the infant formula manufacturers.

Thus, the battle to protect the health and safety of infants and children in the developing world has been renewed. However, this time with the threat of economic blackmail, countries that dare to introduce this resolution or enact its recommendations to promote breast-feeding over that of breast milk substitutes, may not be able to defend themselves, and represents a threat not only to the health and welfare of children in developing nations, but to the health and stability of their home countries as well.

Advocates for health scrambled to find another sponsor for the resolution, but a dozen countries, mostly in Africa and Latin America, backed off citing fears of US retaliation.

The Russians stepped in to introduce the measure, but the Americans did not threaten them. Of course not, the Orangutan takes his orders from Moscow.

The Russian delegate said, “We’re not trying to be a hero here, but we feel that it is wrong when a big country tries to push around some very small countries, especially on an issue that is really important for the rest of the world.”

Oh, so I guess we can forget the over forty years the Soviet Union pushed around the smaller nations in Eastern Europe, as well as their allies in the third world? What would you call the invasions of Hungary and Czechoslovakia? Simple misunderstandings?

But getting back to the issue, it is sickening that the US, being more concerned with the financial health of some multinational formula manufacturers, would prevent mothers from getting information about how beneficial breast-feeding is for their babies, which would go along way to moving them out of poverty, and improve the overall health of people in those countries. Then maybe they wouldn’t need to rush towards our southern border to escape violence, drugs, hunger, poverty and despair. Profits before people, that’s the real American motto and values.

 

Advertisements

Five and a half years

Yesterday marked five and a half years since I began the blog.

To date, it has been viewed in over 100+ countries and had over 33,600 views, as shown in the image here:

The areas in grey represent those countries that have not viewed my blog, and as you can see they are mostly in Africa and part of the Mideast, especially Iran (but you would expect that).

Of course, there are exceptions, such as Greenland and those islands to the east of Greenland. Oh, and there is one other island that has not had any views: Cuba. And one nation that has been in the news of late: North Korea.

Still, I am very happy and grateful for all the views, wherever they come from, but some have surprised even me. Take for instance, the Palestinian territories, China, Vietnam, and those in the northeast part of Africa. Even Saudi Arabia (do they know I am Jewish?)

Thank you all for the past five and a half years, and once again, I’d like to invite you to reach out to me whenever you want to discuss an article, or have something to add. I want to get to know my readers better.

Zika More Dangerous than First Thought

According to two reports on NBCNews.com, the Zika virus is more dangerous than health officials first thought.

The first report from last week can be found here. The second report says that Zika goes to the brain, and causes nerve damage similar to that caused by multiple sclerosis. Zika destroys developing nerve cells.

What does this mean to you, the medical travel facilitators working in Central and South America?

It means that maybe, money spent to attract patients to your countries, might first be better spent cleaning up your slums and cities that have standing water and debris that can be a breeding ground for the mosquitoes that carry the disease.

It also means that you must work closely with your government agencies to assure that medical travel facilities are clean and prepared to deal with the disease, should there be patients who come down with the disease while getting medical care there.

More on Zika and Medical Travel

Ian Youngman posted the following article on IMTJ.com last Friday.

http://www.imtj.com/articles/does-zika-pose-threat-medical-tourism/

This is in addition to the posts I wrote last month, “Will Zika Impact Medical Travel to Latin America?“, “Insurers’ Have Zika on Radar“, “OSHA To Weigh In On Interim Guidelines for Zika this Spring“, and “Zika to Cost Latin America and Caribbean $3.5B“.

 

‘Turkishmaninacanstan’ Strikes Back

Readers of this blog know that from time to time, I have had to criticize those in the workers’ comp industry for their short-sightedness, narrow-mindedness, excessive American Exceptionalism, “Know-nothingism”,  xenophobia and subtle racism.

But when a well-respected online journal re-posts an article by the chief anti-medical travel opponent in the workers’ comp world, it is high time that the medical travel industry speak up and defend itself.

As a tireless advocate for medical travel in workers’ comp, I am leading the charge that you, my friends around the world must do for yourselves.

You will notice the title of this post. This is what the individual in question calls those countries that provide medical travel services. Also, please note that by using this canard as my title, I am in no way insulting Turkey, or any other nation that markets their medical care to the world.

There is fair criticism of Turkey and many other countries in the medical travel industry, but those criticisms are meant to improve the services and to correct the mistakes of the past, and not to pass judgement on them.

But when someone uses a term such as ‘Turkishmaninacanstan’, it conjures up the worse images of third world poverty and backwardness in all aspects of life of the nations so broadly brushed with that epithet.

The individual who coined that despicable name is a self-styled, right-wing American conservative who lives on the gulf coast of the state of Florida, a region where many individuals like him retire to after their careers have declined to play golf.

While this individual may not be one of those just yet, the fact that he dismisses new ideas, that he insults the millions of men and women around the world who are trying to offer real low cost medical care at equal or better quality, that he insults the very nations who could use those resources they are spending to bring medical travelers to their countries as a way to improve their balance of trade and economic power in the global economy, when they could be used to raise the living standards of their poorest citizens, is something that can no longer go unanswered.

So, I ask all of you, doctors, nurses, travel agents, medical tourism promoters and facilitators who are legitimately trying to provide better medical care at lower cost to all of the world’s citizens, to speak up and tell this individual and those like him, that your countries are not ‘Turkishmaninacanstans’, and that you are developing world-class medical facilities that outshine those in his own country, and mine.

Basically, he is calling you con artists and frauds, and that is something that only you can stop.

 

 

 

 

Zika to Cost Latin America and Caribbean $3.5B

Three weeks ago, I wrote a piece about how the Zika virus may affect medical travel to Latin America and the Caribbean.

Today, Business Insurance.com (article unavailable online due to error) reported that the World Bank warned that the spread of the Zika virus across Latin America and the Caribbean is expected to cost those regions about $3.5 billion in forgone economic output.

A full article can be found here.

According to the article, the World Bank is offering $150 million in financing to those countries combating the disease.

This money is nearly three times the the amount of money requested by the United Nations’ health arm on Wednesday.

However, officials at the World Health Organization said that they needed $56 million to help prevent the spread of the virus.

The officials also said that the short-term funding request would be used to speed up research, vaccine development and diagnostics of the relatively unknown virus, and would last until June.

Insurers’ Have Zika on Radar

As a follow-up to my last post on the Zika virus and what the medical travel industry should be doing about it, I want to direct you to what Shelby Livingston wrote last week in Business Insurance.

She said that American health care insurers are closely monitoring the virus, educating their members, but have not yet figured out what it will cost payers.

A spokesperson for Aetna said, “We are in contact with the Centers for Disease Control, U.S. federal agencies, state and local health departments, health care providers and others so that we can provide timely, relevant and accurate information from the CDC to our members and customers. Additionally, we have distributed health information from the CDC to our disease management and case management teams to help support our members.

The statement also said, that it is premature to predict health care costs associated with the Zika virus.

Anthem posted a message on Twitter, Livingston reported, cautioning travelers to the Caribbean to heed the CDC’s warnings; UnitedHealth Group has published updates on its website, but did not respond to her requests for comment on how they are responding to the virus, or whether they are projecting costs associated with the virus.

As I noted in my post last week, this virus may have a chilling effect on your business and the health of your patients. It is advisable to monitor what the US insurers say and do going forward.